![]() With ROM measurements, clinicians canĪdjust treatment plans according to cervical vertebral mobility Including when assessing clinical results after anteriorĭecompression and cervical spine fusion ( 2, 5, 6). Parameter to monitor the effect of cervical disease treatment, Pain and a variety of cervical spine diseases ( 2). Individuals that have long-term immobilization of the neck orĮxcessive neck activity, with most patients exhibiting flexor headĭiseases lead to a decrease in cervical spine range of motion ROM ![]() That neck pain accounts for 14.6% of all musculoskeletal diseases Recent changes in society and lifestyle have causedĪ variety of cervical spine diseases to become more prevalent In summary, the OMCS has good repeatability and validity when measuring CROM and is an effective way to evaluate cervical vertebral range of motion. The Bland‑Altman plots demonstrated that most of the data were within the 95% consistency limit. The range of motion (ROM) was measured by using the OMCS and the CROM device during the same session. Bland‑Altman plot were presented for the two measurement methods. Validity was assessed using the coefficient of determination (R2) in combination with Pearson's correlation coefficient. ![]() Reproducibility of data was assessed using the intra‑group correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimum detectable change (MDC). The motion of the cervical spine in all directions was measured using the OMCS and CROM devices. A total of 20 healthy volunteers were selected and enrolled in the current study after informed consent was received. The current study aimed to assess the repeatability and validity of cervical range of motion (CROM) measurements using an optical motion capture system (OMCS), compared with a CROM device.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |